Violent uprisings in
1910 dictated the future of Mexico. Death danced with the
revolutionaries in the streets. when the violence settled in
1924, over one million Mexicans had lost their lives. Calles,
Obregon, Carranza, Villa, Cardenas and other great military
leaders were quickly engraved into Mexican corridos and history
books but there stood one whom at the time was considered to be
a bandit by both the Mexican and American governments. Emiliano
Zapata.
Why was Zapata
considered to be a bandit? Why did it take him so long to be
seen throughout the world as an ideal revolutionary? Who was
this man they called Zapata and why is he still admired today in
Mexico and here in Aztlan by so many Chicanos?
In order for us to
understand the leader and his movement we have to trace his
orgins. Emiliano Zapata was a dark brown man born in a town in
the state of Morelos. Zapata matured quickly due to his
orphanage at fifteen. By his early twenties he was a well
established man who had his own small piece of land in which he
filled and raised livestock to help his income. He was not poor
in comparison to those around him but compared to other generals
in the Mexican revolution, like Carranza and Obregon he was very
poor. Zapata was very concerned about the poor and usually would
speak on their behalf.
Zapata was prepared
to fight by 1910 when Madero through the Plan de San Luis
encouraged the masses to revolt against the 34 year old
dictatorship of Porfino Diaz. He was prepared to fight to rid
the country of the dictator and to restore justice in Mexico.
when Diaz fled the country Zapata had become more than just a
rebel against Diaz, he was slowly becoming the conscience of the
people of Morelos. Zapata became a leader for the campesinos who
had endured generations of exploration by the wealthy landowners
o hascendadaos.
In 1911 Zapata and
some of his comaneros signed El Plan De Ayala. The treaty
demanded that the lands be returned to those who killed it.
Zapata, eager to have the land returned to those who had lost
their Tierra encouraged many to take back the land that was
theirs even before Madero was elected into office.
As Madero came into
power he was very hesitant on the Plan De Ayala and the
communications between him and Zapata froze. Madero was furious
that Zapata was encouraging so many people to take back their
land without waiting for him to carry out the land reform plan.
Months later Madero began to send troops into Morelos to get rid
of Zapata and his followers Madero made a horrible mistake,
because Zapata's ideology had spread like a brush fire. In the
nearby states of Guerrero and Puebla the campesinos had adopted
the idea of land reform and had joined forces with the
Zapatistas to reach his dream. When Madero sent different troops
out to wipe out the Zapatistas they could never find an army to
fight. Madero could not comprehend that Zapatistas had become
the people of Morelos the young and the old, the woman and the
children.
Despite the burning
of villages and fields the government under Madero could not get
rid of Zapata. Madero even made an attempt to bribe Zapata with
land and horses. Madero attempted to persuade Zapata to stop
fighting and leave the reform up to him. Zapata did not accept
the land and threatened to kill Madero within three days (the
time it took to get to Mexico City from Morelos). Zapata's
promise did not come true because Madero was assassinated by
Victoriano Huerta, one of Madero's military commanders. When
Huera came into power Carranza, Obregon, Calles and Villa were
furious about the assassination which led them to rise up
against him.
The revolt only
lasted until 1914 and by now the key players were Carranza and
Obregon. Zapata and Villa united to fight for land and liberty
and Carranza and Obregon for greed, money and power. After the
uprising had terminated, the results were the same for
Zapatistas. Carranza was backed by the United States and wanted
no part of Zapata and his ideology. Zapata continued fighting on
until 1917.
In 1919, Zapata was
brutally assassinated by general Gonzalez. Gonzalez had faked a
surrender Zapata in the town of Chinameca in the state of
Morelos. Even though many think that with his death his ideology
died in Mexico, this is not true. "Zapatismo had become a
gesture of protest of people who did not want to observe any
more injustice." Days after his death it is believed that in the
trees of Morelos it was written "it is better to die on your
feet than to live on your knees." the ideology of Zapata had
carried on to the Chicano civil rights movement as many banners,
shirts, and corridos were held in high esteem by the young
Chicano leaders who asked for nothing more than a fair
education, land and liberty.
To say that a man of
such great caliber was a bandit does not take into account the
commitment of Zapata to the most disadvantage. Zapata died with
a love for those who followed him and left us with an ideology
that we can all carry in our hearts. "Tierra Y Libertad", Que
via Zapata!!!